Connect assessments, participant feedback and later skill use across cohorts. See who needs support and give program leaders, sponsors and funders evidence they can review.
“I ran the whole client setup on my own this week. Two months ago I would not have tried.”Exit response · AR-118
The baseline survey lives in one spreadsheet. The exit survey lives in another. The follow-up never quite happens. When the funder report is due, someone rebuilds the whole story by hand — and the participants who needed support mid-program were only visible in hindsight.
Each stage adds evidence to the participant record. Consistent identifiers and configured relationships keep the journey connected; teams review missing or mismatched records.
Enrollment captures the skills assessment, confidence score, and goals in one step — one record per participant from day one, ready to compare against later without any file matching.
The midpoint check compares against baseline automatically. When practice confidence lags behind knowledge, the record is flagged — during the program, not in the post-mortem.
Exit assessment lands in the same record, so the change from baseline is computed — not reconstructed. The midpoint intervention and its result stay part of the story.
A short follow-up at 90 days attaches to the same record. Now the funder question — did it last? — has an answer that names its source instead of an anecdote.
Every participant journey rolls into one progression view. The team sees who is ahead, who is stalling, and where the pattern is — while there is still time to change the outcome.
A journey record is only useful because the journey is real: a first assessment in week one, a hard practice session in week five, a job that sticks in month three.
01Week oneEach response opens a participant record that lasts the whole journey.
02Week five
03Day ninetyIllustrative human moments · not customer imagery
Because every stage lives on the same record, the answer is a query — not a reconstruction project.
When every participant record already holds its baseline, exit, and follow-up, the funder report stops being a quarterly reconstruction. Roll cohorts into program and funder views — and let any number be opened back to the people behind it.
Sopact connects the stages, computes the deltas, flags the patterns, and prepares the report. Deciding who gets support, what changes next cohort, and what goes to the funder stays with the people who run the work.
Explore how enrollment, midpoint, exit and follow-up could connect for your program. Bring a cohort, a reporting question and the evidence your stakeholders need to review.
Explore the training evaluation software guide, pre/post survey method and worked report examples. See how the King Center uses program feedback and watch Training Program Data: From Application to Job Placement.
