View product screen ↗Build surveys
Collect recurring check-ins, assessments and feedback across teams and programs.
An AI-native workspace for forms, files and feedback across teams. Your definitions and history give AI context from the start. Your data owners manage collection and access within your organization’s rules.
Start with one workflow. Add teams and use cases as you grow.
Context starts at collection.
Each new team builds on shared definitions and connected history.
WHEN DATA COLLECTION OUTGROWS DISCONNECTED TOOLS
The same collection, context and control.
Across eight workflows.
Connect chapters, members and activity.
Track participant growth and progress.
See learning turn into practice.
Review applications with shared criteria.
Compare results across your portfolio.
Bring site evidence into view.
Connect feedback to customer follow-up.
Understand employee feedback over time.
Collection, reporting and analysis work together in Sopact Sense. Explore the product screens, then see the Assistant in action.
View product screen ↗Collect recurring check-ins, assessments and feedback across teams and programs.
View product screen ↗Collect responses across languages, including Spanish, French, German, Chinese and Arabic.
View product screen ↗Connect each survey to the relevant participant group and manage responses in one place.
View product screen ↗Update questions as your collection needs change, including baseline, midpoint and follow-up stages.
View product screen ↗Turn collected information into reports your team can read and share.
View product screen ↗Summarize responses and surface findings for review alongside your quantitative data.
Ask about the responses, documents and history your team has collected. Explore the answer and the evidence behind it.
See it with your own workflow ↗Illustrative training example. Figures are not customer results.
Replay conversation ↻
“I’m digitizing our entire business through Sopact.”
Open Play connects facility activity, coaching, maintenance and water data. The team spotted a water leak while it could act, then brought evidence from ten programs into one funder report.
Stories 1–4 of 28
How Open Play Foundation centralised its operational and impact data across its sports facilities in Stellenbosch.
Read the published story ↗
How Kuramo Foundation turned an impact framework into a live dashboard before its gender-lens initiative launched.
Read the published story ↗
How AHA Ventures is connecting company evidence, impact plans and reporting as its investment portfolio grows.
Read the published story ↗
How Food4Education is using Sopact in everyday work while building toward connected context across its school-feeding operations.
Read the published story ↗
How the King Center finally read the open-ended feedback it had been collecting all along.
Read the published story ↗
How CMU Project Olympus moved from a tight application deadline to a rubric-backed shortlist without a months-long implementation.
Read the published story ↗
How Action on Poverty reports on programs in 14 countries to funders who each want something different.
Read the published story ↗
How the Kennedy Center measures belonging across fourteen programs and four stakeholder groups on live data.
Read the published story ↗
How ASME turned qualitative data it had only ever used as impact stories into analysed stakeholder insight.
Read the published story ↗
SoPact has implemented an Outcome Tracker dashboard for improved internal reporting and resource allocation.
Read the published story ↗
How Miller Center built measurement capacity inside more than a hundred social enterprises, rather than handing them a dashboard.
Read the published story ↗
How WWF South Africa assembled evidence from four goals and several partners into a single funder-ready narrative.
Read the published story ↗
How the Institute of the Americas is designing a bilingual, rubric-based application workflow for a planned 10-month leadership programme spanning Mexico and the United States.
Read the published story ↗
How Promotora Social México is connecting multilingual grant evaluation and reporting in a single evidence workflow.
Read the published story ↗
How Boston Impact Initiative stopped losing hours to spreadsheets and got back to training fund managers.
Read the published story ↗
How The Lantern Network is turning disconnected training feedback into one evidence practice for participant growth.
Read the published story ↗
How Double Delta turned investee data into a shareable view that helps attract investors for future funds.
Read the published story ↗
How a CDFI aligned its investment strategy with what its stakeholders actually care about, from sourcing to exit.
Read the published story ↗
How Savanna Solutions is structuring outcome measurement so its workforce results are visible rather than anecdotal.
Read the published story ↗
How Gravity Water replaced multiple tools, manual translation and phone calls for meter readings with one multilingual survey.
Read the published story ↗.jpg)
How the Steinman Foundation stopped reading summarised grantee reports and started hearing from stakeholders directly.
Read the published story ↗
How 54 Collective began learning from its impact data within a month, without sending founders more surveys.
Read the published story ↗
How Girls Inc. of Metropolitan Dallas is connecting participant records, programme feedback and progress across reporting years.
Read the published story ↗
How EnCorps found the tutoring threshold that actually moves math scores in high-needs schools.
Read the published story ↗
How Talent Beyond Boundaries replaced a heavy Salesforce and BI stack with one suite, live in under three months.
Read the published story ↗
How Food For Poor moved from counting what it delivered to measuring whether lives actually changed.
Read the published story ↗
How Boys To Men Tucson tracks 198 youth across 23 sites, and shows funders the full picture rather than a highlight reel.
Read the published story ↗
WorldSkills International and Sopact are building a long-term data foundation for a 90-Member network—connecting teams, languages, and learning across event cycles.
Read the published story ↗Start with the short demo.
Explore the context behind it.
A PARTNERSHIP AROUND YOUR WORK
Bring your question and a sample of the information you collect. We’ll explore the right setup and support with you.
Start with one decision and the team responsible for it.
Agree on contributors, collection stages, definitions and access.
Examine the evidence, refine collection and build confidence through use.
Teams managing recurring data collection across people, partners, locations and sources—especially when documents, feedback and follow-ups need to stay connected.
No. Sopact focuses on collecting and understanding data throughout a person’s, partner’s or program’s lifecycle. Existing enterprise systems can stay in place; setup defines which records and connections the workflow needs.
Both. Collect recurring responses, documents and follow-ups in Sopact, and bring relevant existing records into the workflow through agreed imports or integrations.
Agree on whose record you are looking at, what each field means, where information came from, and who should use it. Those choices give analysis its context and make answers easier to review.
AI interprets a response or document alongside related records, shared definitions and review criteria. Your team reviews the supporting evidence before acting.
Start with one workflow and a dedicated data owner. Establish the collection and review process, then extend it when your team is ready.
