play icon for videos
sopact NEWSLETTER
Unlock the power of data-driven insights!

Stay ahead with the latest insights, expert tips, and updates from Sopact.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Use case

Primary Data Collection: Proven Steps to Collect Reliable Data

Learn how to collect clean, reliable primary data using modern, AI-ready methods to reduce errors and turn insights into action.

Best Practices
Terms
TABLE OF CONTENT
Data Collection & Reporting
Use case Selection Guide

Author: Unmesh Sheth

Last Updated:

November 4, 2025

Founder & CEO of Sopact with 35 years of experience in data systems and AI

Primary Data Collection: Transform Impact Through Clean, AI-Ready Evidence

Transform Impact: How to Collect & Use Primary Data for Evidence

Primary data is firsthand, context-rich information collected directly from people, programs, or environments. Unlike secondary data—which is repurposed or historical—primary data captures the real-time voice and evidence you need for confident, measurable decisions.

Yet many teams still struggle with messy spreadsheets, inconsistent IDs, and disconnected systems. Analysts spend 80% of their time cleaning and reconciling errors before they even begin analysis. By the time a dashboard is published, the insights are outdated. This guide walks you through how to modernize your primary data process—making it AI-ready, auditable, and actionable from day one.

By the end of this guide, you'll learn how to:

  • ✓
    Collect primary data that's clean, connected, and trustworthy
  • ✓
    Link numbers and narratives for better storytelling
  • ✓
    Build audit-ready pipelines for data-driven evaluations
  • ✓
    Eliminate silos and cut cleaning time in half
  • ✓
    Turn raw feedback into continuous learning

Whether you're an evaluator, data manager, or impact leader, mastering primary data collection helps you move beyond reporting—and toward real-time, evidence-backed impact.

Primary Data Collection & Analysis Framework

Primary Data Collection & Analysis: The Complete Framework

Clean data collection is the foundation—but what you do with that data determines impact. This framework covers both: 10 non-negotiables for collecting trustworthy data, and 14 analysis methods to extract insights that drive decisions.

Part 1: 10 Non-Negotiables for Primary Data Collection

01

Clean-at-Source Validation

Block bad data before it enters. Required fields, format checks, and duplicate prevention keep metrics trustworthy. Result: reporting prep time drops 30–50%.

02

Identity-First Collection

Every response links to a unique participant ID. Track journeys across pre→mid→post without losing records. Eliminates the typical 15–20% ID loss during linkage.

03

Mixed-Method Pipelines

Combine surveys, interviews, observations, and documents in one place. Keep numbers connected to the "why" with same ID and timestamp across all sources.

04

AI-Ready Structuring

Turn long text and PDFs into consistent themes, rubric scores, and quotable evidence automatically. Converts weeks of manual coding into minutes of processing.

05

Field Notes & Observations

Staff capture real-time notes tagged to participant profiles. Pair observations with attendance and scores. Required metadata: date, site, observer role.

06

Continuous Feedback Loops

Replace annual surveys with touchpoint feedback after every session. Dashboards refresh automatically. Mid-term adjustments can lift completion rates 8–12%.

07

Document Analysis

Extract insights from PDFs and case studies against rubrics. Link evidence back to participant IDs with deep-links to source snippets for full transparency.

08

Numbers + Narratives Together

Read scores next to confidence levels and barriers. When a metric drops, the narrative explains why. Context prevents misinterpretation of trend data.

09

BI-Ready Exports

Export clean tables to Power BI or Looker with data dictionaries and references back to original text. Field provenance included in every export.

10

Living, Audit-Ready Reports

Reports update as new data arrives. Preserve "who said what, when" for continuous learning. Structured inputs plus reviewer sign-off maintain traceability.

Traditional survey platforms stop at collection, forcing teams to export, clean (again), and manually analyze in spreadsheets or BI tools. The real work begins after collection—turning clean, identity-linked data into insights that drive decisions. The following analysis methods show how different questions require different analytical approaches.

Part 2: 14 Primary Data Analysis Methods Matched to Decision Needs

NPS

NPS Analysis

Net Promoter Score

Use Cases

Customer loyalty tracking, stakeholder advocacy measurement, referral likelihood assessment, relationship strength evaluation over time.

When to Use

When you need to understand relationship strength and track loyalty trends. Combines single numeric question (0-10) with open-ended "why?" follow-up.

Implementation: Automated theme extraction from open-text responses pairs with score tracking.
CSAT

CSAT Analysis

Customer Satisfaction

Use Cases

Interaction-specific feedback, service quality measurement, transactional touchpoint evaluation, immediate response tracking.

When to Use

When measuring satisfaction with specific experiences—support tickets, purchases, training sessions. Captures immediate reaction to discrete interactions.

Implementation: Individual record analysis reveals causation patterns for real-time improvements.
PRE

Program Evaluation

Pre-Post Assessment

Use Cases

Outcome measurement, pre-post comparison, participant journey tracking, skills/confidence progression, funder impact reporting.

When to Use

When assessing program effectiveness across multiple dimensions over time. Requires longitudinal tracking with unique IDs through intake, checkpoints, and completion.

Implementation: Time-series analysis aggregates change metrics across entire cohort.
QAL

Open-Text Analysis

Qualitative Coding

Use Cases

Exploratory research, suggestion collection, complaint analysis, unstructured feedback processing, theme extraction from narratives.

When to Use

When collecting detailed qualitative input without predefined scales. Requires theme extraction, sentiment detection, and clustering to find patterns.

Implementation: AI-powered thematic coding identifies patterns across hundreds of responses.
DOC

Document Analysis

PDF/Interview Processing

Use Cases

Extract insights from 5-100 page reports, consistent analysis across multiple interviews, document compliance reviews, rubric-based assessment.

When to Use

When processing lengthy documents or transcripts that traditional survey tools can't handle. Transforms qualitative documents into structured metrics.

Implementation: Document processing extracts structured data using deductive coding and rubric frameworks.
WHY

Causation Analysis

"Why" Understanding

Use Cases

NPS driver analysis, satisfaction factor identification, understanding barriers to success, determining what influences outcomes.

When to Use

When you need to understand why scores increase or decrease and make real-time improvements. Connects individual responses to broader patterns.

Implementation: Contextual synthesis across individual records reveals root causes behind trends.
RUB

Rubric Assessment

Standardized Evaluation

Use Cases

Skills benchmarking, confidence measurement, readiness scoring, scholarship application review, grant proposal evaluation.

When to Use

When you need consistent, standardized assessment across multiple participants or submissions. Applies predefined criteria systematically.

Implementation: Automated scoring applies rubrics at scale ensuring fair, objective evaluation.
PAT

Pattern Recognition

Cross-Response Analysis

Use Cases

Open-ended feedback aggregation, common theme surfacing, sentiment trend detection, identifying most frequent barriers.

When to Use

When analyzing a single dimension (like "biggest challenge") across hundreds of rows to identify recurring patterns and collective insights.

Implementation: Pattern aggregation across column data surfaces most common themes and barriers.
LNG

Longitudinal Tracking

Time-Based Change

Use Cases

Training outcome comparison (pre vs post), skills progression over program duration, confidence growth measurement.

When to Use

When analyzing a single metric over time to measure change. Tracks how specific dimensions evolve through program stages—baseline to midpoint to completion.

Implementation: Time-series metrics track single dimensions across multiple collection points.
MIX

Mixed-Method Research

Qual + Quant Integration

Use Cases

Comprehensive impact assessment, academic research, complex evaluation, evidence-based reporting combining narratives with metrics.

When to Use

When combining quantitative metrics with qualitative narratives for triangulated evidence. Integrates survey scores, open-ended responses, and supplementary documents.

Implementation: Full integration across all data types creates holistic, multi-dimensional analysis.
COH

Cohort Comparison

Group Performance Analysis

Use Cases

Intake vs exit data comparison, multi-cohort performance tracking, identifying shifts in skills or confidence across participant groups.

When to Use

When comparing survey data across all participants to see overall shifts with multiple variables. Analyzes entire cohorts to identify collective patterns.

Implementation: Cross-cohort metrics compare group-level performance across time periods.
DEM

Demographic Segmentation

Cross-Variable Analysis

Use Cases

Theme analysis by demographics (gender, location, age), confidence growth by subgroup, outcome disparities across segments.

When to Use

When cross-analyzing open-ended feedback themes against demographics to reveal how different groups experience programs differently.

Implementation: Segmentation analysis identifies equity gaps and targeted intervention opportunities.
DRV

Satisfaction Driver Analysis

Factor Impact Study

Use Cases

Identifying what drives satisfaction, determining key success factors, uncovering barriers to positive outcomes.

When to Use

When examining factors across many records to identify what most influences overall satisfaction or success. Reveals which elements have greatest impact.

Implementation: Impact correlation analysis determines which factors drive outcomes most significantly.
DSH

Program Dashboard

Multi-Metric Tracking

Use Cases

Tracking completion rate, satisfaction scores, and qualitative themes across cohorts in unified BI-ready format.

When to Use

When you need a comprehensive view of program effectiveness combining quantitative KPIs with qualitative insights for executive-level reporting.

Implementation: BI integration creates living dashboards that connect numbers to stakeholder stories.
Layered Analysis in Practice: A workforce training program might extract confidence levels from open-ended responses, understand why individual participants succeeded or struggled, track how average confidence shifted from pre to post, and create a comprehensive funder report showing outcomes by gender and location—all from the same clean, identity-linked primary data collected at the source. This is the power of matching analytical sophistication to decision requirements rather than survey traditions.
Primary Data: Advantages vs Disadvantages

Primary Data: The Full Picture

Understanding both sides helps you collect smarter

Primary Data Advantages

  • ✓
    Specific to Your Needs

    Designed to answer your exact questions—no irrelevant data

  • ✓
    Current & Relevant

    Fresh insights reflecting today's reality, not outdated trends

  • ✓
    Full Control

    You own the methodology, timeline, and quality standards

  • ✓
    Proprietary Insights

    Competitive advantage from data no one else has

  • ✓
    Contextual Depth

    Capture the "why" behind numbers through direct access

  • ✓
    Audit-Ready

    Documented collection process builds stakeholder trust

Primary Data Disadvantages

  • ✕
    Time-Intensive

    Design, collection, and cleaning can take months

  • ✕
    Higher Costs

    Staff time, tools, and incentives add up quickly

  • ✕
    Quality Risks

    Poor design leads to biased, incomplete, or unusable data

  • ✕
    Respondent Burden

    Survey fatigue drops response rates and quality

  • ✕
    Small Sample Limits

    Budget constraints may reduce statistical power

  • ✕
    Expertise Required

    Valid methodology needs research design skills

Primary Data Examples Across Sectors
Real-World Applications

Primary Data Examples Across Sectors

See how organizations collect first-hand data to drive decisions

🎯

Nonprofit & Social Impact

1

Workforce Training Program Evaluation

Pre/post surveys track skill confidence, test scores, and employment outcomes for participants in job training programs.

Surveys Interviews Skills Tests
2

Beneficiary Feedback Collection

Service recipients share experiences through exit surveys and follow-up calls to improve program delivery.

Feedback Forms Phone Interviews
3

Community Needs Assessment

Door-to-door surveys and focus groups identify gaps in local services and community priorities.

Field Surveys Focus Groups
4

Youth Program Impact Tracking

Attendance records, behavior observations, and parent interviews measure changes in youth engagement and development.

Observations Parent Surveys Case Notes
💼

Business & Customer Experience

1

Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) Surveys

Post-purchase surveys measure satisfaction scores and gather feedback on product quality and service.

Email Surveys In-App Feedback
2

Net Promoter Score (NPS) Tracking

Regular pulse surveys ask "How likely are you to recommend us?" with open-ended follow-up to understand drivers.

NPS Surveys Sentiment Analysis
3

User Testing & Product Research

Observing customers interact with prototypes reveals usability issues and feature preferences before launch.

Usability Tests A/B Testing
4

Employee Engagement Surveys

Anonymous quarterly surveys capture staff satisfaction, retention risk, and workplace culture feedback.

Internal Surveys Exit Interviews
📚

Education & Training

1

Student Learning Assessments

Pre/post tests measure knowledge gain while reflection essays capture deeper understanding and application.

Tests & Quizzes Essays
2

Course Evaluation Surveys

End-of-semester feedback rates instructor effectiveness, curriculum relevance, and overall learning experience.

Course Surveys Focus Groups
3

Classroom Observations

Trained observers document teaching methods, student engagement, and classroom dynamics for quality improvement.

Observation Protocols Field Notes
4

Alumni Career Tracking

Follow-up surveys track graduate employment rates, salary ranges, and career satisfaction years after completion.

Longitudinal Surveys LinkedIn Analysis
🔬

Research & Evaluation

1

Clinical Trials & Health Studies

Patient interviews, medical tests, and symptom diaries collect first-hand data on treatment effectiveness.

Patient Interviews Medical Tests Diaries
2

Ethnographic Field Research

Researchers immerse themselves in communities, documenting behaviors, rituals, and social dynamics through observation.

Participant Observation Field Notes
3

Policy Impact Evaluation

Before/after surveys and interviews with affected populations measure real-world policy outcomes and unintended effects.

Household Surveys Key Informant Interviews
4

Market Research Studies

Focus groups, taste tests, and shopping behavior observations inform product development and positioning strategies.

Focus Groups Taste Tests Behavioral Tracking
Understanding Secondary Data: Definition & Comparison

What Is Secondary Data?

Definition

Secondary data is information that already exists—collected by someone else for a different purpose, but available for you to analyze and apply to your own research questions.

While primary data comes directly from your stakeholders through surveys, interviews, and observations, secondary data lives in reports, databases, government records, and published studies. It's the foundation of desk research, trend analysis, and benchmarking.

Organizations use secondary data to understand context before collecting primary data. For example, a nonprofit designing a youth employment program might first review national unemployment statistics, industry hiring trends, and prior program evaluations—then use those insights to shape their own surveys and interviews.

Why Secondary Data Matters

  • Speeds up research: Existing data eliminates months of collection time
  • Reduces costs: No need to design instruments or recruit participants
  • Provides benchmarks: Compare your results against industry standards or historical trends
  • Uncovers patterns: Large-scale datasets reveal insights impossible to capture in small samples
  • Validates findings: Cross-reference your primary data with external sources for credibility

However, secondary data comes with trade-offs. You don't control how it was collected, which questions were asked, or whether the sample matches your population. The data might be outdated, incomplete, or measured differently than you need. Smart researchers combine both: secondary data for context and comparison, primary data for specific, current insights.

Secondary Data Examples

Secondary data appears across every sector—from government statistics to industry benchmarks. Here are common examples that organizations use to inform decisions without conducting their own studies.

1

Census & Demographic Data

Government census bureaus provide population statistics, income levels, education rates, and housing data by geography—essential for program planning and market analysis.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistics Canada
2

Industry Reports & Market Research

Companies like Nielsen, Gartner, and McKinsey publish sector trends, market sizing, and competitive analysis—used for strategic planning and investor pitches.

Source: Gartner, McKinsey, Forrester
3

Employment & Labor Statistics

Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks unemployment rates, wage trends, and job openings by industry—critical for workforce development programs and HR benchmarking.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
4

Academic Research & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Published studies in journals provide validated methodologies, effect sizes, and evidence-based practices—foundations for program design and literature reviews.

Source: JSTOR, PubMed, Google Scholar
5

Financial Statements & Annual Reports

Public companies file financial data with regulatory agencies—investors and analysts use these for valuation, risk assessment, and competitive comparison.

Source: SEC filings, company websites
6

Social Media Analytics & Web Data

Platforms provide aggregated data on user behavior, sentiment trends, and engagement patterns—used for brand monitoring and campaign optimization.

Source: Twitter Analytics, Meta Business Suite
7

Health & Disease Surveillance Data

CDC and WHO track disease prevalence, vaccination rates, and health outcomes—public health organizations use these to allocate resources and design interventions.

Source: CDC, WHO, state health departments
8

Internal Organizational Records

Your own past program data, CRM records, or service logs become secondary data when analyzed for new questions—like comparing this year's cohort to historical trends.

Source: Internal databases, past reports

Secondary Data Analysis

Secondary data analysis means extracting new insights from existing datasets—answering questions the original researchers never asked. It's a core research method for benchmarking, trend analysis, and evidence synthesis.

How to Analyze Secondary Data Effectively

1

Evaluate Source Quality

Check who collected the data, their methodology, sample size, and date. Government and academic sources typically have stronger validity than industry blogs or advocacy reports.

2

Identify Relevant Variables

Not every field in a dataset matters for your question. Filter to the specific metrics, demographics, or time periods that align with your research goals.

3

Clean & Standardize

Secondary data often has inconsistent formats, missing values, or outdated categories. Standardize units, handle nulls, and document any transformations for transparency.

4

Cross-Reference Multiple Sources

Triangulate findings across 2-3 independent sources to confirm patterns. If census data says X but industry reports say Y, investigate the discrepancy before drawing conclusions.

5

Document Limitations

Always note what the data can't tell you—sample bias, outdated collection dates, or missing variables. Transparent limitations build stakeholder trust in your analysis.

When to Combine Primary + Secondary Analysis

The strongest research designs use secondary data for context (industry benchmarks, historical trends) and primary data for specificity (your stakeholders' current experiences). For example, compare your program's employment outcomes against national BLS data to show relative impact.

Primary Data vs Secondary Data

Understanding when to collect first-hand vs. leverage existing information

Primary Data

Secondary Data

What It Is

Collected directly by you

First-hand information gathered through your own surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments.

Collected by someone else

Pre-existing information from reports, databases, studies, or records—originally gathered for different purposes.

Purpose

Answers your specific questions

Designed to address your exact research needs and organizational goals.

Originally for different questions

Created for someone else's research or operational needs—you adapt it to your context.

Timing

Current and real-time

Reflects today's reality—captures recent changes and emerging trends as they happen.

Historical or lagging

May be months or years old—useful for trends but can miss recent shifts.

Control & Customization

Full control over methodology

You design questions, select samples, and ensure quality standards match your needs.

No control over collection

You inherit someone else's methods, biases, and limitations—can't change what was asked or how.

Cost & Time Investment

High cost, long timeline

Design, collection, cleaning, and analysis can take months and require significant budget.

Low cost, immediate access

Often free or low-cost—available immediately for download or access through databases.

Relevance to Your Context

Perfect fit for your needs

Every question aligns with your population, program, or business goals.

May require adaptation

Might not match your geography, demographics, or specific variables—needs creative interpretation.

When to Use

When you need specificity

Use for program evaluation, stakeholder feedback, product testing, or any situation requiring tailored insights.

When you need context

Use for benchmarking, literature reviews, market sizing, or understanding broader trends before primary collection.

Primary Data Sources

  • Surveys & questionnaires
  • One-on-one interviews
  • Focus groups
  • Observations & field notes
  • Experiments & trials
  • Tests & assessments
  • Customer feedback forms
  • Case studies

Secondary Data Sources

  • Government databases (Census, BLS)
  • Academic journals & research papers
  • Industry reports & whitepapers
  • Annual reports & financial statements
  • News archives & media coverage
  • NGO & foundation publications
  • Internal organizational records
  • Social media analytics

Primary Data Types

From surveys to continuous feedback, each source strengthens evidence when it’s identity-linked, clean-at-source, and instantly analyzable.

Surveys

Problem: isolated tools, duplicates, delays.

AI-Ready: unique IDs; scales + “why”; one pipeline for scores and stories.

Interviews

Problem: transcripts pile up, coding varies.

AI-Ready: themes, rubrics, summaries in minutes—consistent and citable.

Observations

Problem: context stuck in private notes.

AI-Ready: attach to identity; auto-summarize into actionable decisions.

Self-Assessments

Problem: scores without reasons.

AI-Ready: pair scales with “why”; compare pre→mid→post while keeping identity intact.

Documents

Problem: manual reading and subjective scoring.

AI-Ready: rubric checks, evidence extraction, and consistent summaries.

Continuous Feedback

Problem: one-off, rear-view surveys.

AI-Ready: frequent pulses, live dashboards, and small fixes made early.

References - Primary Data Collection & Analysis

References

  1. 1
    OECD OURdata Index
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
    oecd.org/governance/digital-government/ourdata-index
    2023 Edition
  2. 2
    Impact Management Project – Structuring and Managing Impact
    Impact Management Project
    impactmanagementproject.com
    Data quality and impact measurement principles
  3. 3
    World Bank Evaluation Principles
    Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank
    ieg.worldbankgroup.org/methodology/evaluation-principles
    Updated evaluation standards and methodologies
  4. 4
    UNICEF Ethical Research Standards
    United Nations Children's Fund
    unicef.org/evaluation/documents/ethical-research-standards
    2021 Edition - Ethical guidelines for data collection involving vulnerable populations
  5. 5
    OECD AI Principles
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
    oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
    Principles for responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI
Standards Application: These frameworks establish best practices for data quality, ethical collection, and impact measurement. Primary data collection must balance technical rigor (clean data, unique IDs, validation) with ethical standards (consent, privacy, vulnerable populations) while maintaining audit trails that satisfy evaluation bodies like World Bank IEG and international development standards.

Frequently Asked: Modern Primary Data Collection

Clarifying critical questions that deepen trust, speed, and AI-readiness in primary data collection.

Q1How does “clean-at-source” reduce post-collection rework?
Clean-at-source means enforcing validation rules, required fields, and duplicate detection right when the data is entered. This helps prevent errors before they spread into your dataset. As a result, teams spend less time on manual cleanup and more time interpreting meaning. Over time, the consistency of inputs strengthens confidence in reports and saves effort. It shifts your workflow from data prep to insight generation.
Q2Why must each response tie to an identity?
Associating every input with a unique identifier ensures continuity across surveys, interviews, and uploads. It prevents duplication and allows tracking of each participant’s trajectory. This linkage is essential for longitudinal analysis, cohort comparisons, and causal insight. Maintaining identity consistency turns isolated snapshots into a narrative thread. That continuity gives your data coherence and depth.
Q3How can mixed-method inputs stay unified in one pipeline?
Mixed-method pipeline design treats all inputs—surveys, interviews, observations, documents—as relational pieces under one schema. Open-text and structured data enter the same hub, linked by identity. AI agents auto-code or cluster text, aligning it with numeric fields. The result: you can query across modalities seamlessly. It eliminates manual joins and ensures everything lives in a single analytical layer.
Q4What does “agentic AI” do in qualitative work?
Agentic AI consumes long-form text, transcripts, and documents to identify themes, sentiments, and scores automatically. It clusters responses, flags anomalies, and aligns narrative insight with metrics. Human reviewers still validate or refine edge cases, but bulk work is handled by AI. This accelerates insight generation and ensures consistency across reviewers. It blends qualitative nuance with scalable rigor.
Q5How do continuous feedback loops change decision timing?
Continuous feedback captures reactions immediately after sessions, events, or touchpoints—rather than waiting months. Dashboards update in near real time, enabling course corrections during implementation. That helps teams detect emerging risks early or amplify wins rapidly. Decisions shift from reactive to proactive. It turns your data pipeline into a responsive engine, not a retrospective report.
Q6Will this approach fully eliminate manual dashboards?
Automated pipelines and AI structure most of the analysis work, but dashboards still benefit from human oversight and narrative insight. You gain time by reducing repetitive tasks like cleaning, merging, and reformatting. However, teams often curate, interpret, and annotate dashboards with domain-specific context. The shift is from manual plumbing to meaningful storytelling. Reports become living artifacts, not one-off exports.
Q7How do you maintain transparency in AI-assisted insights?
Transparency comes from traceability—linking every theme, score, or metric to the original input text and timestamp. You version AI logic, maintain review trails, and allow reviewer override. This ensures each claim is auditable and defensible. That transparency builds trust with stakeholders, particularly when metrics and narratives intertwine. An AI-assisted system should never obscure the path from source to insight.

Data Collection Use Cases

Explore Sopact’s data collection guides—from techniques and methods to software and tools—built for clean-at-source inputs and continuous feedback.

Primary Data Keywords - Webflow Safe

Primary Data Keywords & Subtopics

SEO-Optimized Keyword Strategy for Primary Data Collection Content

95Keywords
25Priority Terms
8Categories

No matching keywords found

Try adjusting your search or filter criteria

Time to Rethink Primary Data Collection for Today’s Needs

Imagine data collection processes that evolve with your needs, keep data pristine from the first response, and feed AI-ready datasets in seconds—not months.
Upload feature in Sopact Sense is a Multi Model agent showing you can upload long-form documents, images, videos

AI-Native

Upload text, images, video, and long-form documents and let our agentic AI transform them into actionable insights instantly.
Sopact Sense Team collaboration. seamlessly invite team members

Smart Collaborative

Enables seamless team collaboration making it simple to co-design forms, align data across departments, and engage stakeholders to correct or complete information.
Unique Id and unique links eliminates duplicates and provides data accuracy

True data integrity

Every respondent gets a unique ID and link. Automatically eliminating duplicates, spotting typos, and enabling in-form corrections.
Sopact Sense is self driven, improve and correct your forms quickly

Self-Driven

Update questions, add new fields, or tweak logic yourself, no developers required. Launch improvements in minutes, not weeks.
Sopact is a technology based social enterprise committed to helping organizations measure impact by directly involving their stakeholders.
Solutions
AboutBlogCustomersContactPrivacy Policy
Resources
E-LearningCustomer StoriesUse CasesReportsWebinarseBooks
Useful links
Impact MeasurementImpact Measurement & ManagementImpact ReportImpact DashboardResource Center
Copyright 2015-2025 © sopact. All rights reserved.