Build an impact measurement plan your team can use
Choose evidence to fit the decision, distinguish delivery from change, and connect collection to review and action.
Use cases · The practical library
Practical guides and lessons on impact measurement, reporting, research and data. Start with the question in front of you.
50 selected Use Case guides · 8 Academy lessons · One search
58 articles
Choose evidence to fit the decision, distinguish delivery from change, and connect collection to review and action.
Keep definitions, evidence and review decisions connected while preparing useful views for funders, program teams and boards.
Build an inspectable trail from a number, theme or narrative claim to its definition, source snapshot, calculation and review.
Adapt a focused question set, separate members from representatives, and report satisfaction alongside response coverage.
Build a theory of change with explicit assumptions, alternative explanations and evidence that can challenge the model.
Create a small data dictionary with field definitions, missing-value rules, owners and versions, then test one complete record.
Create criteria and observable score anchors, work through a fellowship example, and preserve reviewer reasoning.
Define an observable behavior, plan follow-up, and interpret application rates with missing responses and opportunity in view.
Use seven adaptable sections, a worked sample and a claim-to-source register to write findings with visible limitations.
Practice combining comparable results, calculating the right reporting base and showing incompatible measures, missing data and overlap separately.
Map a participant journey, identify decisions and owners, and test what happens when a handoff or follow-up fails.
Use training, customer, employee and partner examples to connect findings, coverage, limitations and next actions.
Connect organizations, agreements, periods and sources; resolve incompatible definitions before adding results together.
Distinguish suppliers, sites, documents and findings, then assign follow-up and check whether the response worked.
Plan useful collection moments and compare responses without letting one large or vocal account stand for every customer.
Calculate eNPS, show participation, explain confidentiality and return a useful response to employees.
Use question examples for six stakeholder groups and keep local questions useful without losing comparison.
Choose who to follow, link responses appropriately, and show invitations, responses and usable matches separately.
Improve notes, handoffs, review schedules and access so staff can understand the current plan and act on it.
Connect intake, planning, coordination and review with a practical handoff example and a clear record of what comes next.
Use three levels of assessment and a worked example to separate learning needs from operational barriers.
Choose questions for a specific decision, plan collection and coverage, and prepare to review the answers.
Use formulas and a worked scorecard to distinguish participation, learning, application and results.
Examine criteria, blind review and reviewer disagreement without treating a score difference as proof of bias.
Inspect the criterion, source evidence and uncertainty, then test consistency and define who approves the decision.
Link the approved plan, reporting periods and later evidence, including amendments and missing follow-up.
Use a reusable structure and worked example to connect each status to its definition, coverage, evidence and next action.
Assess the evidence behind an impact thesis, record uncertainty, and carry useful questions into later investee updates.
Use a practical outline and worked decision brief to show what changed, what is missing and what the board needs to decide.
Connect delivery evidence, partner experience and shared definitions with a worked review and explicit reporting bases.
Keep signals, findings and decisions distinct, preserve conflicting evidence, and make response ownership visible.
Connect check-ins, service history, reviewed findings and action owners, then check what the customer experienced afterward.
Use response examples, status definitions and a worked report to track what the team did and what remains unresolved.
Choose relevant raters and clear behaviors, protect confidentiality, and use a worked example to plan and review an action.
Choose relevant measures, make denominators explicit, and handle small groups and changing workforce context carefully.
Build and review a codebook, examine worked coding examples, and report themes with clear denominators and limits.
Work through a partner-report review, test extraction and interpretation, and check whether cited passages support the answer.
Compare surveys, interviews, observation and records, then create a collection plan that keeps sources and responsibilities clear.
Separate participation, quality, experience and outcome measures using formulas and a worked scorecard.
Use examples across five settings to distinguish outputs, outcomes and impact, then write indicators with clear definitions.
Adapt an editable worksheet, use a filled example, and assign evidence questions, review responsibilities and the next revision.
Use practical metric examples and a definition template to specify the population, calculation, source and follow-up period.
Set the questions, measures, sources, timing and owners; use a worked example to keep monitoring and evaluation connected.
Choose the evaluation purpose and evidence, fill a concise plan, and connect findings to a decision and responsible owner.
Compare matched and unmatched results, make missing follow-up visible, and report only what the evaluation design supports.
Understand causal questions, common evaluation designs and the difference between observed change and an attributable effect.
Build a requirements register, adapt a six-section outline, and reuse evidence across funders without mixing incompatible measures.
Count people and participation accurately, preserve program differences, and show outcome coverage alongside organization-wide findings.
Use a donor-report outline and youth-program example to connect the gift, results, source evidence and appropriate next steps.
Adapt a story structure, connect individual accounts to evidence, and preserve contributors’ permission, dignity and voice.
Choose a small common core, preserve local detail, avoid double-counting and organize a reporting cycle partners can maintain.
Adapt 26 questions by evidence need, response format and timing, then plan matching and explain which respondents the findings represent.
Choose relevant outcomes, plan the participant journey, examine follow-up coverage and return findings young people can use.
Build five known-answer checks for counts, missing responses, duplicates and corrections; review interpretation separately from calculation.
Connect each reporting request to an approved measure, evidence source, collection moment, gap and responsible owner.
Build a one-page evidence register with definitions, owners, permitted uses and source checks, then test it with deliberate errors.
Classify an edit, preserve the original question and write a change log that explains whether earlier and later responses remain comparable.
Preserve original answers, separate response status from themes and keep a cleaning log with explicit denominators and duplicate rules.
Try fewer words, choose one of the suggested searches above, or browse the full selection.
Browse all articles →Keep learning with Academy
Use Case guides answer a practical question. Academy lessons help you build the skill through an exercise. For a complete learning path, choose an Academy course.
Find your free course