Stop Reading Grant Reports.
Start Understanding Your Grantees.

Sopact Sense reviews every application against your rubric, builds the Logic Model at interview, and tracks every outcome commitment automatically — so your Program Officers spend time on decisions, not data entry.

See It With Your Grant Portfolio

FOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS, FAMILY FOUNDATIONS, GOVERNMENT GRANTMAKERS, AND
CORPORATE CSR TEAMS

80% LESS REVIEW TIME  ·  LOGIC MODEL AUTO-BUILT AT INTERVIEW  ·  
UNUSUAL LEARNINGS NO REPORT WOULD SURFACE

This is some text inside of a div block.

Stop Reading Every Application.Start Selecting the Best Grantees.

Other platforms: 500 applications, 5 reviewers, 30 days of reading grant narratives.

Sopact Sense reads every submission — all pages, all attachments — scores against your rubric with citation trails, and surfaces only the ones that merit human review. Your Program Officers focus on deciding, not extracting.

Phase 01

INPUT

Applications + Supporting Docs

Proposals, budgets, LOIs, attachments

SOPACT SENSE

Document Intelligence

AI scoring + inconsistency detection

OUTPUT

Scored & Ranked

Every score has a citation trail

Obvious cases advance automatically. Borderline cases get flagged for human judgment. Your reviewers focus where they actually add value — not on reading application 347 at 11pm.

This is some text inside of a div block.

Every Interview Builds the Logic Model.Not Just Notes in a Google Doc.

After selection, most tools go dark. Sopact carries the grantee's application context forward — their stated outcomes, their flagged gaps, their budget questions — so your interview resolves what the application left open.

What comes out isn't just a conversation summary. It's a signed Logic Model that becomes the data dictionary for everything that follows.

Whether it's a mid-grant check-in six months later or a renewal brief two years out, Sopact connects it to the same record — not a new spreadsheet.

Phase 02

INPUT

Application Context + Interview

Pre-loaded from Phase 01

SOPACT SENSE

Interview Intelligence

AI resolves gaps, builds commitments

OUTPUT

Signed Logic Model + Data Dictionary

Becomes the source of truth for Step 3

This is where Sopact differs from every tool in this category. When you check in on a grantee six months later, Sopact already knows what they promised, what the gaps were, and what was agreed at interview. No re-introduction needed.

Four Ways Sopact Outperforms Traditional Review Tools

01

Bias Detection & Calibration — Track scoring patterns across reviewers, demographics, and geography.

02

Program Intelligence — Aggregate winner outcomes across cohorts by program area and geography.

03

Follow-Up Automation — Know who hasn't responded, what's missing, and when to re-engage.

04

Predictive Selection — Identify application patterns that predict winner success over time.

This is some text inside of a div block.

Show Your Board What theGrant Actually Produced

Every check-in, progress report, and follow-up feeds one unified view — what you funded, what they committed to, and what your grant actually produced. Generated automatically.

Phase 03

INPUT

Grantee Check-Ins + Progress Reports

Pre-loaded from Phase 01 + 02

SOPACT SENSE

Unified Analysis Engine

Cross-references all grantee intelligence

OUTPUT

Grant Intelligence Reports

From one unified data flow

Your board wants to know if the grant worked. Your leadership wants to know who to fund next year. Sopact gives both answers from the same data — without a separate reporting project.

Every competitor stops at the award decision. Sopact goes beyond it — see what that looks like.

Stop Drowning in Applications. Start Selecting What Works.

See how Sopact Sense transforms competitive review from subjective scoring to evidence-backed decisions — with follow-up intelligence that closes the loop.

See It With Your Applications

Six Intelligence Outputs FromOne Data Flow

Portfolio Health Reporr\t

Aggregate outcomes across all grantees and cohorts.

See which cohorts are delivering, plateauing, or at risk — across your entire grant portfolio at once.

Missing Data Alert

Who hasn't reported, what's incomplete

Know exactly who is behind, what's missing, and how to follow up — before a deadline becomes a problem.

Renewal Summary

Auto-generated across all active grantees and check-ins.

Every active grantee's follow-up status in one view. No manual tracking. No surprises when renewal season arrives.

Progress vs. Promise

Compare actual outcomes against what grantees committed.

AI synthesizes grantee narratives, interview transcripts, and progress reports into thematic patterns. Theme extraction at scale, sentiment tracking, and cross-grantee patterns.

Fairness Audit

Scoring patterns by reviewer and demographic

Identify where reviewer bias may have influenced decisions — with evidence you can act on.

Board Report

Executive program summary with recommendations

A board-ready narrative of portfolio performance, top performers, risks, and renewal recommendations.

For Your Program Team

For Leadership & Board

Continuous Intelligence

Stakeholder Intelligence

Know every grantee deeply — their complete history, commitments, and evolving outcomes. Not just their last report.

Actionable Intelligence

Turn grant data into decisions. AI extracts themes, flags risks, and surfaces what matters — so you act in days, not months after reports land.

Your grant portfolio doesn't just report outcomes — it reveals them. Every cycle, Sopact gets smarter about what strong grantees look like. Your next cohort benefits from every check-in your previous one produced.

Stop Managing Grant Reporting.Start Understanding Your Grantees.

See how Sopact Sense transforms manual review from subjective scoring to evidence-backed decisions — with outcome intelligence that closes the loop.

See It With Your Grant Portfolio

The Intelligence That Never Shows Upin a Narrative Report

Traditional grant reporting gives you what grantees choose to tell you. Sopact reads what's actually in the data — and surfaces what no one thought to mention.

APPLICANT

Unique ID

Persistent record

Cycle 1

Application

Scored & reviewed

Cycle 2

Renewal

Context carried forward

Cycle 3

Outcome Data

Longitudinal evidence