Skip to content
Close
SEARCH
Talk to us
Talk to us
fastrack logo
Unlock Your Success with Dedicated FasTrack
Go from impact strategy to dashboard in just 60 days! Streamline Impact and Savings with Sopact's FasTrack bootcamp.
Reserve my seat
  • Review and certify the strategy.
  • Integrate with Google Sheets & Excel
  • Create a survey and collect data.
  • Create a dashboard with your data.
  • All that in just 60 days!
Complete Schedule
Services
Custom Services
Frame 18
Aligning Logic, Metrics, Data—Visualized!

Social Impact Metrics

Elevate your impact strategy to new heights by integrating standard and custom metrics with Sopact's expertly designed templates and data-driven approach.

Download eBook
social impact metircs

Social Impact Metrics

Social Impact Metrics is the key to assessing your social and environmental impact, and it's a critical element of any successful impact strategy. It's an essential tool for both non-profits and for-profit organizations alike, enabling them to track and measure the positive change they create in the world.

However, while measuring social impact is critical, it can be a challenging task. Identifying the right metrics, collecting data, and analyzing results can be time-consuming and complex. That's where Sopact comes in. Our SAAS-based software simplifies the process of measuring social impact and helps you make data-driven decisions. With our solution, you'll be able to assess your impact effectively and make the necessary improvements to achieve your goals.

Ready to get started? Sopact has developed an impact strategy app to help you assess your organization's social impact, identify the right metrics, and create an actionable strategy to improve your impact. Visit our website to review our impact strategy video, access our library of strategies, training, and examples, and start making a difference today!

In this article, you will learn.

  • Activity, output, and outcome metrics
  • How to design effective SMART metrics
  • Qualitative and quantitative metrics
  • Baseline metrics
  • Targets
  • Align with investors

 

 

corp_chris

Impact Metrics Foundations

This video explains your organization's intended path to impact by outlining causal linkages in an initiative (i.e., its shorter-term, intermediate, and longer-term outcomes and outputs).

Learn:

  • What is the impact metric
  • Standard vs Custom Metrics
  • Important to align with investors
  • Benefits of aligning with five dimensions of impact from the Impact Management Project

Chris Gains, Sopact Lead Trainer
How to design effective

SMART Metrics

In this article, we will take significant challenges facing Girls in many parts of the world. However, using this example, we will develop a series of deep processes to understand SMART metrics, qualitative and quantitative metrics, and how potential funders can align investment metrics with investors and enterprises who work closely with stakeholders (girls at risk). We that you will develop a deeper understanding of how to design an effective theory of change or logic model and choose effective impact metrics

Girls at risk of sex trafficking face numerous challenges that limit their access to education and economic opportunities. However, by providing STEM education and training, we can help these girls gain the skills necessary to secure local employment and break the cycle of exploitation. In this article, we'll explore how SMART metrics can measure and drive the success of STEM education programs to empower girls at risk of sex trafficking.

Girls at risk of sex trafficking face numerous challenges that limit their access to education and economic opportunities. For example, they may come from marginalized communities with limited educational opportunities or have dropped out of school due to poverty or other pressures. Additionally, they may lack the necessary skills to secure gainful employment, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation.

The Importance of SMART Metrics

SMART metrics are essential for measuring and driving the success of STEM education programs to empower girls at risk of sex trafficking. By setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound metrics, we can focus our efforts on what matters most and ensure that we are making a real impact.

SMART metrics are effective indicators that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. SMART metrics help organizations set goals and track progress toward those goals.

Example: If the program aims to improve mother and child mortality, a SMART metric could be to increase the number of mothers receiving prenatal care by 10% next year.

SMART Metrics Example:

Here is an example of using SMART metrics to track progress toward reducing mother and child mortality in a low-resource community.

The program aims to increase the number of mothers receiving prenatal care by 10% next year. The program can use SMART metrics to track progress toward this goal.

For example, our Activity Metric will increase the program's monthly prenatal and postnatal care sessions by 10% next year.

Here is the breakdown of S, M, A, R, and T for this activity metric:

  • S (Specific): The goal is specific and clearly defined, which is to increase the number of prenatal and postnatal care sessions conducted each month.
  • M (Measurable): The program can measure the progress towards the goal using a specific and quantifiable metric: the number of monthly prenatal and postnatal care sessions conducted.
  • An (Achievable): The goal is achievable with the available resources, as a 10% increase is reasonable given the program's current capacity.
  • R (Relevant): The goal is relevant to the overall impact goal of the program, which is to improve maternal and child health outcomes.
  • T (Time-bound): The goal is time-bound with a specific deadline or timeframe for achieving it: to increase the number of prenatal and postnatal care sessions conducted by 10% in the next year.

 

Types of SMART Metrics:

There are different types of SMART metrics that organizations can use to track progress toward their goals. These include the total number, percentage change, comparison to the target, and baseline comparison.

Example: If the goal of the program is to improve mother and child mortality, some SMART metrics could be the total number of mothers receiving prenatal care

Type of Metric Example
Total Number Total number of mothers receiving prenatal care
Percentage Change Percentage change in the number of mothers receiving prenatal care compared to the previous year
Comparison to Target Comparison of the number of mothers receiving prenatal care to the target set by the program
Baseline Comparison

Comparison of the number of mothers receiving prenatal care before and after the program

 

 

Designing effective impact metrics

A logic model for education visually represents an educational program or initiative's inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact. It is a tool that helps educators and stakeholders design, implement, and evaluate educational programs by outlining the program's underlying assumptions, goals, and intended results. A logic model provides a clear and concise framework for understanding how different program components contribute to achieving desired outcomes and impact. This model can communicate program goals, track progress, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate program effectiveness to stakeholders. Logic models are widely used in education to plan and evaluate programs, including K-12, higher, and adult education programs. They can be tailored to specific educational contexts and help educators make data-driven decisions to improve program quality and effectiveness. A logic model for education is a valuable tool for educators and stakeholders to plan, implement, and evaluate programs that contribute to positive student educational outcomes.

Example: STEM education

  • Logic Model: Girls at risk of sex trafficking can be upskilled through STEM education, preparing them for skills necessary for local employment.
  • Problem Statement: Girls at risk of sex trafficking lack the skills necessary to find employment and are vulnerable to being trafficked.
  • SDG Indicator ID: 5.5.1
  • Key stakeholders: At-risk girls, STEM educators, local employers
  • Key impact themes: Gender equality, Education, Decent work, and economic growth

Logic model for education

Activity: Providing STEM Education to Girls at Risk of Sex Trafficking

Output:

  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking receive STEM education
  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking can acquire knowledge and skills in STEM fields

Outcome:

  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking are better equipped to pursue local employment opportunities in STEM-related fields
  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking are less vulnerable to sex trafficking due to having alternative employment opportunities

Activity Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Number of girls enrolled Quantitative 30 100
Attendance rate Quantitative 60% 90%
Dropout rate Quantitative 15% < 10%
Curriculum coverage Qualitative Average Satisfactory
Quality of teaching Qualitative Average Satisfactory

Output Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Number of counseling sessions Quantitative 73 200
Number of mentorship sessions Quantitative 53 200
Satisfaction with counseling Qualitative Low Satisfactory
Satisfaction with mentorship Qualitative Average Satisfactory

 

Outcome Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Number of girls employed locally Quantitative N/A 60
Income earned by girls Quantitative N/A Above minimum wage
Girls' perception of future Qualitative N/A Positive and hopeful
Girls' vulnerability to sex trafficking Quantitative N/A Reduced

Activity: Providing Career Counseling and Mentorship to Girls

Output:

  • Girls receive career counseling and mentorship to help them explore different STEM-related fields and job opportunities
  • Girls receive guidance and support in developing their career plans

Outcome:

  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking can identify and pursue STEM-related career paths well-suited to their interests and skills.
  • Girls at risk of sex trafficking are likelier to obtain local employment in STEM fields. successfully

 

Activity Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Number of counseling sessions Quantitative 73 200
Number of mentorship sessions Quantitative 53 200
Satisfaction with counseling Qualitative Low Satisfactory
Satisfaction with mentorship Qualitative Average Satisfactory

Output Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Girls with career plans Quantitative N/A 80
Girls who receive mentorship Quantitative N/A 100
Girls who pursue STEM careers Qualitative N/A Satisfactory
Girls who apply for local jobs Quantitative N/A 80

Outcome Metrics:

Metrics Type Baseline Target
Girls who successfully obtain local employment Quantitative 15 60
Girls' income from local employment Quantitative Below Market Rate Above minimum wage
Girls' satisfaction with local employment    

 

Input,output, Outcome, Impact Metrics

Input, output, outcome, and outcome metrics are terms commonly used in program evaluation, project management, and business analysis to assess the effectiveness and impact of a program, project, or initiative

Lanch Your App
  • Baseline
  • Input
  • Output
  • Outcome
  • Output vs Outcome

Baseline Metrics

Baseline metrics are quantitative measurements that establish a starting point for assessing the social or environmental outcomes of an intervention, program, or policy. These metrics are collected before initiating the intervention and are used to evaluate its effectiveness by comparing post-intervention outcomes to the baseline. Baseline metrics are essential for understanding the impact of social initiatives on targeted communities, stakeholders, or the environment.

Baseline Metrics Examples 

  • Educational Attainment: A nonprofit organization improving educational outcomes in underserved communities may establish baseline metrics for high school graduation rates and literacy levels. After launching an educational support program, the organization can compare the new graduation rates and literacy levels to the baseline to evaluate the program's impact on educational attainment.
  • Access to Clean Water: A development agency aiming to increase access to clean water in a rural region may measure baseline metrics for the percentage of households with access to clean drinking water and the incidence of waterborne diseases. After constructing new water infrastructure, the agency can assess the impact of the intervention by comparing the new metrics to the baseline.
  • Carbon Emissions Reduction: An environmental advocacy group focused on reducing carbon emissions may establish baseline metrics for the carbon footprint of a specific industry or region. After implementing a campaign to promote sustainable practices, the group can measure changes in carbon emissions and compare them to the baseline to evaluate the campaign's effectiveness in reducing environmental impact.

When to Use Baseline Metrics?

  • When planning and implementing social or environmental interventions: Baseline metrics provide a clear picture of the initial conditions, allowing organizations to determine the effectiveness of their interventions by comparing post-implementation outcomes to the baseline.
  • When setting social or environmental goals and targets: Baseline metrics help organizations set realistic and achievable goals by understanding the current state of social or environmental conditions.
  • When monitoring and evaluating social or environmental outcomes over time: Baseline metrics can track progress, measure improvements, and identify areas that may require further intervention or support.

Input Metrics

Input metrics are quantitative measurements that capture the resources, efforts, or inputs invested in a program, project, or intervention. These metrics are used to monitor the allocation and utilization of resources, and they provide valuable information for planning, budgeting, and decision-making. Input metrics help organizations ensure the efficient use of resources and assess the feasibility and scalability of initiatives. They are particularly important for understanding the relationship between inputs and outcomes or impact.

 

Input Metrics Examples:

Funding Allocation: A nonprofit organization working on poverty alleviation may track input metrics such as the amount of funding allocated to different program components, such as microloans, skills training, and community development. Monitoring these input metrics allows the organization to assess how resources are distributed and identify opportunities for optimizing funding allocation.

Volunteer Hours: A community-based initiative focused on environmental conservation may measure input metrics such as the number of volunteer hours dedicated to activities such as tree planting, clean-up campaigns, and environmental education. These metrics help the initiative gauge volunteer engagement and measure the effort invested in achieving conservation goals.

Training Sessions: A health organization aiming to reduce the spread of infectious diseases may track input metrics related to the number of training sessions conducted, the number of healthcare professionals trained, and the duration of each training session. By monitoring these input metrics, the organization can assess the reach and intensity of its training efforts.

When to Use Input Metrics?

  • When planning and budgeting for social or environmental initiatives: Input metrics provide essential resource allocation and budgeting information, helping organizations ensure that resources are used efficiently and effectively.
  • When evaluating the scalability and replicability of programs or interventions: Input metrics allow organizations to assess the resources required to scale up an initiative or replicate it in different contexts.
  • When analyzing the relationship between inputs and outcomes: Input metrics, in conjunction with the outcome and impact metrics, can be used to analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of initiatives. This analysis helps organizations understand how different levels of inputs contribute to achieving desired social or environmental outcomes.
Overall, input metrics play a vital role in the planning, implementing, and evaluating of social impact initiatives. They provide insights into the level of resources invested and support informed decision-making to maximize positive social or environmental impact.

Output Metrics

Output metrics are quantitative measurements that capture the immediate results or products of a program, project, or intervention. These metrics reflect the direct outputs generated by an initiative and are often tied to the activities undertaken or the resources utilized. Output metrics are essential for monitoring the progress of initiatives, assessing operational efficiency, and ensuring the achievement of short-term objectives. While output metrics indicate what has been produced, they do not measure an initiative's long-term impact or outcomes.

Output Metrics Examples

  • Health Clinic Services: A health organization working to improve access to healthcare in underserved communities may track output metrics such as the number of patients served, the number of medical consultations provided, and the number of medications distributed. These metrics allow the organization to monitor the reach and scale of its healthcare services.
  • Educational Resources: An education-focused nonprofit organization may measure output metrics related to the number of textbooks distributed, workshops conducted, and students attending educational sessions. Monitoring these output metrics helps the organization assess its progress in delivering educational resources and student support.
  • Environmental Cleanup: An environmental conservation group conducting a beach cleanup campaign may track output metrics such as the amount of trash collected, the number of cleanup events organized, and the number of volunteers participating in each event. These metrics provide insights into the direct results of the cleanup efforts.

When to Use Output Metrics?

  • When monitoring the progress of social or environmental initiatives: Output metrics provide real-time data on the activities and deliverables of an initiative, enabling organizations to track progress and make adjustments as needed.
  • When evaluating operational efficiency: Output metrics can be used to assess the efficiency of processes and activities, helping organizations identify areas for improvement and optimize resource utilization.
  • When reporting on the immediate results of programs or interventions: Output metrics offer a way for organizations to communicate the tangible results of their work to stakeholders, donors, and the public.
It is important to note that while output metrics are valuable for measuring immediate results, they should be complemented by the outcome and impact metrics to assess the broader effects and long-term changes brought about by an initiative. Together, these metrics provide a comprehensive view of an organization's performance and impact in addressing social or environmental challenges.

Outcome Metrics

Outcome metrics are quantitative measurements that capture the changes, effects, or benefits experienced by individuals, communities, or the environment as a result of a program, project, or intervention. These metrics go beyond the immediate outputs of an initiative to assess the intermediate or longer-term changes that contribute to achieving the initiative's overall goals or impact. Outcome metrics are essential for evaluating the effectiveness of initiatives, understanding their social or environmental value, and demonstrating the positive difference made by the efforts undertaken.

 

Outcome Metrics Examples

  • Health Outcomes: A public health organization working to combat malnutrition in vulnerable communities may track outcome metrics such as the reduction in malnutrition rates, improvements in children's growth indicators, and increases in households with access to nutritious food. These metrics allow the organization to assess the health impact of its nutrition programs.
  • Educational Outcomes: An education-focused nonprofit organization may measure outcome metrics related to student academic performance improvements, school attendance rates, and student attitudes toward learning. Monitoring these outcome metrics helps the organization evaluate the effectiveness of its educational interventions in enhancing student outcomes.
  • Environmental Outcomes: A conservation group working to protect a natural habitat may track outcome metrics such as the restoration of native vegetation, the rebound of wildlife populations, and the reduction in pollution levels within the habitat. These metrics provide insights into the environmental impact of the group's conservation efforts.

When to Use Outcome Metrics?

  • When evaluating the effectiveness of social or environmental initiatives: Outcome metrics provide valuable data on the changes brought about by an initiative, enabling organizations to assess the effectiveness of their efforts in achieving desired outcomes.
  • When demonstrating the value and impact of programs or interventions: Outcome metrics offer a way for organizations to communicate the positive effects of their work to stakeholders, donors, and the public, enhancing accountability and transparency.
  • When informing future program design and decision-making: Outcome metrics, when analyzed in conjunction with input and output metrics, can inform future program design by highlighting the factors contributing to successful outcomes and identifying areas for improvement.
Overall, outcome metrics are critical in measuring the positive changes that social impact initiatives aim to achieve. By tracking and analyzing these metrics, organizations can better understand their impact, make data-driven decisions, and continuously improve their efforts to address social or environmental challenges.

Difference between Output and Outcome

Output Metrics vs. Outcome Metrics

Output metrics are quantitative measurements that capture the immediate results or products of a program, project, or intervention. These metrics reflect the direct outputs generated by an initiative and are closely linked to the activities undertaken or the resources utilized. Output metrics provide information about what has been produced or delivered as part of an initiative, but they do not assess the longer-term impact or outcomes of the initiative.

 

Critical Characteristics of Output Metrics:

  • Immediate Results: Output metrics measure the tangible deliverables or direct results of an initiative, such as the number of training sessions conducted, the number of meals distributed, or the number of educational materials provided.
  • Activity-Based: Output metrics are directly tied to the activities or processes of an initiative and help monitor the implementation and operational aspects of the program.
  • Short-Term Focus: Output metrics are typically focused on the short-term and provide information about what has been achieved during a specific period.

Example of Output Metrics:

A community health program may track output metrics such as the number of health screenings conducted, the number of vaccinations administered, and the number of health education sessions held.


Outcome metrics are quantitative measurements that capture the changes, effects, or benefits experienced by individuals, communities, or the environment resulting from a program, project, or intervention. These metrics assess the intermediate or longer-term changes contributing to achieving the initiative's overall goals or impact. Outcome metrics focus on the difference made by the efforts undertaken, capturing the positive changes and value generated by the initiative.

Critical Characteristics of Outcome Metrics:

  • Changes and Effects: Outcome metrics measure the changes or effects experienced by the target population or environment, such as improvements in health indicators, increases in income levels, or reductions in pollution levels.
  • Impact-Focused: Outcome metrics assess an initiative's impact and help evaluate its effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes.
  • Longer-Term Focus: Outcome metrics may have a longer-term focus and provide information about an initiative's sustained changes and impact over time.
    Example of Outcome Metrics:

The same community health program may track outcome metrics such as the reduction in the prevalence of a specific disease, improvements in overall community health, and increased awareness of preventive health practices.


Critical Differences Between Output and Outcome Metrics:

  • Outputs vs. Effects: Output metrics measure what has been produced or delivered by an initiative (e.g., number of training), whereas outcome metrics measure the changes or effects brought about by the initiative (e.g., increase in knowledge or skills).
  • Short-Term vs. Longer-Term: Output metrics capture the immediate results of activities, while outcome metrics assess intermediate or longer-term changes that contribute to achieving the initiative's goals.
  • Activities vs. Impact: Output metrics are tied to the activities or processes of an initiative, while outcome metrics are focused on evaluating the impact or effectiveness of the initiative.

Output and outcome metrics are essential components of program evaluation and performance measurement. Output metrics help monitor progress and ensure that activities are on track, while outcome metrics evaluate the initiative's effectiveness and impact on achieving positive social or environmental change.

 

Output and outcome are two terms that are commonly used in program evaluation and performance measurement. Outputs refer to the direct products, services, or activities that a program or intervention produces. In contrast, outcomes refer to the changes or results due to those outputs.

For example, providing STEM education to girls at risk of sex trafficking is an output. The number of girls completing the STEM education program and the number of STEM skills they acquire are also outputs. Conversely, the outcome is the long-term impact of the STEM education program, such as girls securing employment in STEM-related fields, reducing their vulnerability to sex trafficking, and improving their economic well-being.

Another example could be providing career counseling and mentorship to girls. The number of counseling and mentorship sessions provided are outputs, while the number of girls who develop career plans and pursue STEM-related careers are outcomes. The outcome is the girls' successful employment in STEM-related fields, which leads to increased economic stability and reduced vulnerability to sex trafficking.

It's essential to use both outputs and outcomes when evaluating the effectiveness of a program or intervention. Outputs can help measure a program's immediate results, while outcomes measure the longer-term impact.

Outputs are beneficial when evaluating the performance of a program or intervention in the short term, such as measuring the number of people who receive a service or complete a program. They are also helpful for monitoring program implementation, as they can help identify areas where improvements can be made.

Outcomes, on the other hand, are beneficial when evaluating the impact of a program or intervention over the long term. They are also crucial for demonstrating the value and effectiveness of a program or intervention to stakeholders, such as donors or investors. By focusing on outcomes, programs can show the tangible and sustainable changes they are making in the lives of their participants.

In summary, both outputs and outcomes are essential for evaluating the effectiveness of a program or intervention. Outputs help measure a program's immediate results, while outcomes measure the longer-term impact. Therefore, using both outputs and outcomes when evaluating program effectiveness is essential, as they provide a complete picture of the program's impact.

Defining effective qualitative and quantitative indicators

When measuring impact, there are two types of indicators: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative indicators are non-numerical measurements that rely on observations and perceptions. On the other hand, quantitative indicators are numerical measurements that provide statistical data. Both types of indicators help measure impact, but they have different strengths and weaknesses.

Let's consider a use case better to understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative indicators. Suppose a nonprofit organization wants to improve the mother and child mortality issue in a low-resource community. The organization can use qualitative and quantitative indicators to track progress toward its goal.

theory of change public health

Logic Model Diagram: Mother and child mortality in low-income or resource area

A qualitative indicator could be the community's perception of the importance of prenatal care. The program can track the community's perception through surveys, focus groups, or interviews to understand their attitudes toward prenatal care. Qualitative indicators provide in-depth insights into the program's impact on the community.

A quantitative indicator could be the number of mothers receiving prenatal care. The program can track the number of mothers receiving prenatal care each year to understand the program's impact. Quantitative indicators provide objective data that is easy to compare and analyze.

In this use case, the organization can use qualitative and quantitative indicators to understand the program's impact comprehensively. Qualitative indicators provide insights into the perception and behavior change in the community, while quantitative indicators provide statistical data that can be used to measure progress and set goals.

In conclusion, both qualitative and quantitative indicators have their advantages and disadvantages. The choice of the type of indicators depends on the nature of the program and the intended impact. By using both types of indicators, organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of their impact and make data-driven decisions to improve their programs.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Indicators:

Both qualitative and quantitative indicators have their advantages and disadvantages. Qualitative indicators provide in-depth insights but can be challenging to quantify and compare. Quantitative indicators provide objective data but may miss essential aspects of the impact. The choice of the type of indicators depends on the nature of the program and the intended impact.

Lanch Your App

 Qualitative Indicators

Qualitative indicators are non-numerical measurements that rely on observations and perceptions. They provide in-depth insights into the impact of programs or initiatives. Qualitative indicators help measure complex and subjective concepts such as behavior change, attitudes, and perceptions.

  • Example 1: If the program aims to improve mother and child mortality, a qualitative indicator could be the community's perception of the importance of prenatal care. The program can track the community's perception through surveys, focus groups, or interviews to understand their attitudes toward prenatal care.
  • Example 2: Another example of a qualitative indicator could be the changes in behavior among program participants. For instance, if the program aims to improve child health, a qualitative indicator could be the change in mothers' perception towards vaccination.

Qualitative Indicator Examples:

Qualitative metrics are non-numerical measurements that rely on observations and perceptions. Here are a few examples of qualitative metrics that can be used to measure impact:

  • Community Perception: This metric measures the community's perception of the program. It can be measured through surveys, focus groups, or interviews. This metric can help to understand the attitudes and perceptions of the community towards the program and identify areas of improvement.
  • Behavioral Change: This metric measures the change in behavior among the target population. It can be measured through surveys, observations, or interviews. This metric can help to understand the impact of the program on the target population and identify areas of improvement.
  • Community Engagement: This metric measures the community's level of engagement with the program. It can be measured through surveys, observations, or interviews. This metric can help to understand the community's level of participation and identify ways to increase engagement.

Quantitative Indicators:

Quantitative indicators are numerical measurements that provide statistical data. They offer a more objective and standardized way of measuring progress. Quantitative indicators help measure the impact of a program on a larger scale.

  • Example 1: If the program aims to improve mother and child mortality, a quantitative indicator could be the number of mothers receiving prenatal care. The program can track the number of mothers receiving prenatal care each year to understand the program's impact.
  • Example 2: Another example of a quantitative indicator could be the number of births attended by skilled personnel. The program can track the number of births attended by skilled personnel before and after the program to understand the impact.

In addition to the indicators, it's essential to understand the data types associated with qualitative and quantitative indicators.

Quantitative Indicator Examples

Quantitative metrics, on the other hand, are numerical measurements that provide statistical data. Here are a few examples of quantitative metrics that can be used to measure impact:

  • Number of Beneficiaries: This metric measures the number of people who have benefited from the program. It can be measured through surveys, observations, or interviews. This metric can help to understand the program's reach and identify ways to increase the number of beneficiaries.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: This metric measures the cost-effectiveness of the program. It can be measured by comparing the program's cost with achieved outcomes. This metric can help identify improvement areas and optimize the program to achieve better outcomes at a lower cost.
  • Time-Savings: This metric measures the time saved by the target population due to the program. It can be measured through surveys, observations, or interviews. This metric can help to understand the program's impact on the target population and identify areas of improvement.

In conclusion, both qualitative and quantitative metrics are essential in measuring impact. Qualitative metrics provide insights into the perceptions and attitudes of the community, while quantitative metrics provide objective data that can be used to measure progress and set goals. By using both types of metrics, organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of their impact and make data-driven decisions to improve their programs.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Indicator

Qualitative indicators are subjective and descriptive, while quantitative indicators are objective and numerical. Qualitative indicators provide information about the quality of a program or project, while quantitative indicators provide information about the quantity of a program or project. Mixing qualitative and quantitative indicators is best because they provide a more comprehensive understanding of the program or project's effectiveness. Quantitative data provides statistical evidence, while qualitative data provides contextual information that explains the quantitative data.

Here is a table that outlines the definitions, benefits, and methods of collecting qualitative and quantitative data:

Data Type Definition Benefits Methods of Collecting
Qualitative Descriptive, subjective information Provides contextual information that explains the data Interviews, focus groups, observation, case studies
Quantitative Objective, numerical data Provides statistical evidence Surveys, questionnaires, experiments, statistical analysis

 

Let's consider a STEM education program for an integrated example of how combining both qualitative and quantitative data can improve outcomes. The program aims to improve student performance and teacher satisfaction in STEM subjects.

Qualitative data could be collected through interviews with students and teachers to gain insight into their experiences with the program. The interviews could be open-ended, allowing participants to share their opinions and perceptions of the program. This information could provide context for quantitative data, such as test scores or teacher retention rates.

Quantitative data could be collected through surveys to measure student performance and teacher satisfaction. For example, surveys could be administered to students before and after the program to measure changes in their understanding of STEM subjects. Teacher satisfaction surveys could be administered annually to measure changes in teacher satisfaction with the program.

By combining both types of data, the STEM education program can better understand its effectiveness. Qualitative data can provide insight into why certain outcomes were achieved, while quantitative data provides statistical evidence of the program's impact. This information can be used to make informed decisions about the program and make improvements to ensure its continued success.

Qualitative Data

Qualitative data is non-numerical data based on observations, perceptions, and attitudes. Qualitative data is collected through surveys, focus groups, interviews, and observations. Qualitative data provides in-depth insights into the program's impact on the community. It helps to understand the attitudes and perceptions of the community towards the program and can be used to identify areas of improvement.

On the other hand, quantitative data refers to numerical data that provides statistical information. Quantitative data is collected through surveys, questionnaires, and observations. Quantitative data is easy to analyze and compare, making it helpful in tracking progress and setting goals. It provides objective information about the program's impact and helps make data-driven decisions.

In the example of improving mother and child mortality in low-resource communities, qualitative data can be collected through focus groups, interviews, or surveys to understand the community's perception of prenatal care. This data can help the program identify the barriers that prevent mothers from seeking prenatal care and develop interventions to address those barriers.

Quantitative Data

Quantitative data, on the other hand, can be collected through surveys or observations to track the number of mothers receiving prenatal care. This data can be used to measure progress toward the program's goal and set targets for the future.

By using both types of data, organizations can comprehensively understand their impact and make data-driven decisions to improve their programs. Qualitative data provides insights into the perceptions and attitudes of the community, while quantitative data provides objective information about the program's impact.

In conclusion, both qualitative and quantitative data are essential in measuring impact. Qualitative data provides in-depth insights into the program's impact, while quantitative data provides statistical information that can be used to measure progress and set goals. By using both types of data, organizations can comprehensively understand their impact and make data-driven decisions to improve their programs.

Impact Metrics 101

Standard, custom, and baseline metrics are all performance metrics commonly used in program evaluation and performance measurement. Here is a detailed definition and examples of each:

Standard Metrics:

Standard metrics are pre-defined metrics commonly used across multiple programs or interventions. These metrics are widely recognized and accepted, and are often used to compare the performance of different programs or interventions. Some examples of standard metrics include:

  • Number of program participants
  • Program completion rates
  • Employment rates
  • Income levels
  • Educational attainment

When to use: Standard metrics are useful when evaluating the performance of a program or intervention relative to others in the same sector or field. They can also be useful for benchmarking against industry standards or best practices.

Custom Metrics: 

Custom metrics are metrics that are specific to a particular program or intervention. They are developed based on the unique goals, objectives, and outcomes of the program or intervention. Some examples of custom metrics include:

  • Number of at-risk girls who complete a STEM education program
  • Number of girls who secure employment in a STEM-related field within six months of completing the program
  • Income levels of girls who complete the program

When to use: Custom metrics are helpful when the goals, objectives, and outcomes of a program or intervention are unique and cannot be adequately measured using standard metrics. Custom metrics can provide a more nuanced understanding of program performance and can help demonstrate the program's value to stakeholders.

 

INCLUDED IN IMPACT CLOUD

Metrics Catalog

Global and National Indicators

  • UN Sustainable Development Goals Sustainable Development Goals are a collection of 17 global goals set by the UN starting  2015. Sustainable Development that includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This international collaboration between 193 UN Member States and global organizations and agencies is outlined in the UN Resolution A/RES/70/1 established in September 2015.

    The SDGs are seen as a step towards international collective impact efforts, focusing and guiding the interventions of humanitarian efforts around the globe.

    “We don’t have plan B because there is no planet B.”
  •  United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon

 

 

Impact Investment Indicators

Impact investments are investments made in companies, organizations, and funds to generate social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.

GIIN IRIS  IRIS and IRIS + by Global Impact Investor's network. SoPact is well aligned with GIIN IRIS+ and impact partner.
Making Iris Actionable

 

 

Impact Investing Metrics

Investor impact metrics are performance metrics designed to measure investments' social, environmental, and financial impact. Investors use these metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of their assets in achieving their desired impact goals.

Soapct Impact Strategy's AI-driven approach simplifies alignment between investors and enterprises by automating tracking and reporting on impact metrics. The AI-driven method uses machine learning algorithms to analyze large amounts of data, identify trends and patterns, and generate insights that can be used to improve impact outcomes.

The AI-driven approach simplifies alignment between investors and enterprises by providing a standardized framework for measuring impact. The framework includes a set of standard impact metrics widely recognized and accepted by investors and custom impact metrics specific to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of a particular program or intervention.

By using a standardized framework for measuring impact, investors can more easily compare the performance of different investments and make informed investment decisions. Additionally, by automating the tracking and reporting process on impact metrics, enterprises can save time and resources and focus more on achieving their desired impact outcomes.

In summary, investor impact metrics are performance metrics specifically designed to measure investments' social, environmental, and financial impact. Soapct Impact Strategy's AI-driven approach simplifies alignment between investors and enterprises by providing a standardized framework for measuring impact and automating the tracking and reporting process on impact metrics. This approach can help investors make more informed investment decisions and help the enterprise achieve its desired impact outcomes more efficiently.

Aligning with

IRIS Indicators

IRIS metrics that could align with the activities, outputs, and outcomes outlined above:

Activity: Providing STEM Education to Girls at Risk of Sex Trafficking

Output:

  • IRIS Metric: Number of students completing STEM education and training programs (PI5234)
  • IRIS Metric: Percentage of students completing STEM education and training programs who secure employment in the field (PI5235)

Outcome:

  • IRIS Metric: Percentage of students who report improved confidence in STEM fields after completing the program (PI5552)
  • IRIS Metric: Percentage of program graduates who secure employment in a STEM-related field (PI5235)

Activity: Providing Career Counseling and Mentorship to Girls

Output:

  • IRIS Metric: Number of individuals served by employment services programs (PI5892)
  • IRIS Metric: Number of individuals who receive career counseling or mentorship services (PI5895)

Outcome:

  • IRIS Metric: Percentage of program participants who secure employment within six months of completing the program (PI5235)
  • IRIS Metric: Average income of program graduates six months after securing employment (PI5356)

Note that not all IRIS metrics may be applicable or relevant to a particular program or organization, and it's important to carefully consider which metrics align with your specific goals and objectives.

Social Impact KPI

A Social Impact KPI (Key Performance Indicator) is a measurable value used to track and evaluate the progress of an organization's social impact goals. It is a specific metric that reflects the positive change that an organization is creating in society or the environment. 

When evaluating the effectiveness of an organization's initiatives, programs, or projects, impact metrics are a crucial tool. These metrics are used to assess how well an organization is achieving its goals by measuring the actual effects of its work on a targeted population or environment. Impact metrics can be both quantitative and qualitative and help demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of an organization's efforts.

One important aspect of impact metrics is that they focus on outcomes rather than inputs or activities. Output metrics, for example, measure a program's intermediate activities or deliverables, such as the number of people served or the number of workshops held. On the other hand, impact metrics measure the actual impact of those activities and deliverables on the targeted population or environment.

Social Impact KPI Examples

Examples of Social Impact KPIs can include the number of people impacted by a program, reduced total carbon emissions, or the percentage of women employed in leadership positions. These KPIs are used to assess the effectiveness of an organization's impact strategy and to make data-driven decisions to improve social and environmental outcomes.

For example, an organization working to improve educational outcomes for low-income students may use output metrics such as the number of students enrolled in its programs or the number of hours of tutoring provided. However, the organization's impact metrics would measure the actual impact of those activities on students' academic performance and graduation rates.

When selecting impact metrics, ensuring they are directly related to the organization's goals and objectives are essential. In addition, impact metrics should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). It's also necessary to have short-term and long-term impact metrics to track progress over time.

Additionally, Impact metrics should be relevant to the population or group at which the initiative, program, or project is aimed and should be reliable, valid, and generalizable.

Organizations must also have systems to collect and analyze data to use impact metrics effectively. This data can track progress over time and adjust programs as needed. A precise data collection and analysis plan can help ensure that the information is accurate and that the metrics are appropriately used to make data-driven decisions.

Overall, impact metrics are a crucial tool for evaluating the effectiveness of an organization's work. By focusing on outcomes rather than inputs or activities and selecting metrics directly related to the organization's goals and objectives, impact metrics can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of programs and help organizations achieve their goals more efficiently and effectively.