play icon for videos

Sopact Sense — The AI Workflow for Impact Data

Multiple surveys are like snapshots in time. Sopact adds an intelligent layer to connect and builds a workflow underneath to make them a complete insight

US
Pioneering the best AI-native application & portfolio intelligence platform
Updated
May 8, 2026
360 feedback training evaluation
Use Case
Use case · Sopact Sense

The intelligence layer for stakeholder data.

One persistent record per stakeholder, from first contact through long-term outcome.

01 · The intelligence layer

Most enterprise data dies at collection. Sopact Sense is the layer where it survives.

Most enterprise data dies at collection. Sopact Sense is the layer where it thrives. Most AI models fall short on consistent results. Same prompt, different answer every time. For enterprise use cases such as portfolio or application management it is NOT acceptable. Sopact's intelligent agentic layer sits above AI models to provide the consistent and auditable answer every time.

Slide 1 of 6 · The 5% problem

Most enterprise data dies at collection.

The numbers your team reports on came from closed-ended fields: Likert scales, dropdowns, multiple-choice. The open-text answers, the document uploads, the interview transcripts that explain why the numbers moved sit unread in an export. That is roughly 95% of what stakeholders actually told you.

What you collected100%
What you reported on5%
What you actually analyzed5%
Stakeholder data, by what happens to it
5% 95%     
unread filed archived lost
Slide 2 of 6 · The determinism gap

Same prompt. Different answer. Every time.

Generative AI on its own is a fluent improviser. Ask Claude or GPT to score the same essay three times with the same rubric. You will get three different scores, three different reasonings, three different citations. For an enterprise scoring an applicant, awarding a grant, or admitting a fellow, that is not a feature. It is a liability.

Score variance across runs±0.7
Citations matched between runs0 of 3
Acceptable for an admit decisionNo
Slide 3 of 6 · The advance layer

The model reads. Sopact locks the answer.

Sopact built a thin deterministic layer above Claude, OpenAI, and Gemini. The model still does the reading: analyzing essays, extracting themes, identifying patterns. But the rubric is frozen. The output schema is typed. Citations are required for every score. Run the same record through it a hundred times and you will get the same answer a hundred times.

Slide 4 of 6 · The persistent record

One ID. Issued once. Carried forever.

When a stakeholder first contacts you, whether they submit an application, open a document, or join a cohort, Sopact issues them a unique ID. That ID never resets. It runs through the onboarding intake, the quarterly check-in, the completion data, the six-month follow-up, and the alumni survey two years later. Every piece of evidence joins the same record under the same ID.

Slide 5 of 6 · Context that compounds

The record does not reset between cycles.

Five years later, that same ID has accumulated everything: application essay, onboarding survey, mid-program interview, completion outcomes, six-month follow-up, alumni response, even unsolicited feedback they emailed in year three. Cross-cycle analysis becomes a single query, not a multi-week reconciliation project. Pre-and-post comparison is mechanical, not manual.

Slide 6 of 6 · The intelligence layer

The intelligence layer for stakeholder data.

Deterministic AI on top of generative models. Persistent records compounding across cycles. One stakeholder, one record, every stage. From first contact to long-term outcome, Sopact Sense is the substrate AI agents and reporting tools can finally act on.

Book a discovery call
Already on Sopact Sense
Carnegie Mellon Higher education
PSM Foundation Philanthropy
Boys to Men Tucson Youth program
DeterministicSame input, same answer, every time.
PersistentOne ID per stakeholder, carried for years.
ComposableSubstrate for agents and reports.
Slide 1 of 6

Six beats walking through the determinism gap and the persistent record that closes it.

95%
Context lost
Traditional collection captures roughly five percent of what your stakeholders actually said. The other ninety-five sits unread.
Same prompt
Generative AI returns a different answer every time. For an enterprise scoring decision, that's not infrastructure.
1
Persistent record
One ID at first contact. Same ID at every stage. The record doesn't restart between cycles — it compounds.

And here's what you can build on the substrate.

02 · Two engines

Six engines per side. One substrate underneath.

Stakeholder Intelligence runs the people work — applicants, fellows, scholars, trainees, alumni. Partner Intelligence runs the organizational work — investees, grantees, suppliers, cohort companies. Same record format, different relationship.

Slide 1 of 7 · Application opens

The cycle begins.

A scholarship round opens. The application form goes live with branded fields: essay, resume, recommendation letters, transcript upload. From the moment the first applicant lands on the page, Sopact issues them a unique stakeholder ID. That ID will carry them through every stage.

RoundCohort 2024-Fall
Application opens2024-04-01
First applicant IDSTK-09134
Fellowship application
ID issued · STK-09134
Full name
Maya Hernandez
Email
maya.h@university.edu
Personal essay · 1,847 words
When I think about what brought me to this point, I keep returning to the night my mother handed me her acceptance letter from twenty years ago, the one she never got to use. The same envelope. The same paper. The same waiting...
Documents
PDFResume.pdf
PDFTranscript.pdf
RECLetter 1 received
RECLetter 2 pending
Slide 2 of 7 · Apply

Three documents. One record.

The applicant submits an essay (1,847 words), uploads their resume, triggers two recommendation letter requests. As each document arrives, Cell scoring runs in the background: extracting themes, scoring writing quality, identifying potential red flags. The applicant sees only "submitted." Reviewers see structured analysis attached to the record before they ever open the file.

Documents read4
Themes extracted3
Reviewer time saved (est.)22 min
DOC
Essay.docx
1,847 words
PDF
Resume.pdf
2 pages
REC
Letter 1
Prof. Adler
REC
Letter 2
Dr. Okafor
Cell extraction · STK-09134
Themes identified
Resilience after academic interruption
First-generation college ambition
Commitment to community return
Quality signals
Writing quality4.1 / 5 Evidence strengthStrong Potential flagsNone
12 paragraphs read · 3 themes pinned · attached to record
Slide 3 of 7 · Score

Multi-criteria fit assessment.

When applications close, Row scoring reads the entire record at once: essay, resume, recommendations, interview transcript. It applies the program's rubric, weights criteria according to the program's logic, and produces a single fit score with a reasoning trace explaining how each field contributed. Reviewers validate the AI's read. They do not create scores from scratch.

Criteria scored5
Citations attached12
Reviewer taskValidate, not author
STK-09134 · Maya Hernandez
Cohort 2024-Fall · Row scored
Fit
4.2 / 5
Academic readiness 4.0 transcript
Demonstrated need 4.5 essay ¶2
Program fit 4.3 essay ¶4
Leadership potential 3.8 rec 1
Resilience markers 4.4 essay ¶3
Row · 5 criteria · 12 citations · reasoning trace per score
Slide 4 of 7 · Admit

Decision day, not decision quarter.

The admit decision is made. The same persistent ID, STK-09134, carries forward to the next stage. No data migration. No separate database. No handoff to a CRM that loses context. The application essay, the score, and the reasoning trace all stay attached to the record for the next five years.

DecisionAdmitted
Time to decision3 days
Record handoffs0
STK-09134 · Maya Hernandez
Year 1 · Spring
Decision
Admitted to Cohort 2024-Fall
Application essay (1,847 words) attached
Fit score · 4.2 / 5 5 criteria
Reviewer notes · 2 reviewers 12 citations
Source documents 4 files
Next stage · Onboarding intake
Slide 5 of 7 · Onboard & check in

Three measurement points, one record.

Onboarding intake captures baseline data: pre-program confidence, current employment, demographic disaggregations the funder requires. Three months later, a mid-program check-in surveys the same scholar with the same ID. Pre/post linking is automatic. No manual matching. No reconciling spreadsheets. No losing scholars who change emails.

Pre · onboarding confidence2.1
Mid · check-in confidence3.4
Post · completion confidence4.6
Confidence trajectory
STK-09134
5 4 3 2 2.1 3.4 4.6
Pre
2024-09
Mid
2025-02
Post
2025-06
Same ID across all three measurements STK-09134
Slide 6 of 7 · Complete

Outcome measurement, not outcome assertion.

When the scholar completes the program, completion data joins the same record. The funder report writes itself from the longitudinal data: completion rate, confidence change pre-to-post, demographic disaggregation as required. No three-week pre-report cleanup. No reverse-engineering metrics from spreadsheet exports.

Pre-report cleanup time0 days
Metrics traceable to source100%
Data dictionary alignmentLocked
Funder report · Q4 2025
Cohort 2024-Fall · Outcomes summary
Completion rate
87%
vs 71% prior cohort
Confidence Δ
+2.5
pre → post, n=124
First-gen
68%
funder requirement met
Completion rate · 87%n=124 records
Confidence change · +2.5 pre to post3 measurements
Demographic disaggregationfunder spec
Citation traceability per metric100%
Generated from one record per scholar · same ID, every stage
Slide 7 of 7 · Alumni · Year 5

The same ID, five years later.

Two years after graduation, an alumni follow-up survey goes out. Same stakeholder ID. Sopact knows what they said in their application essay, how their confidence moved during the program, what they reported at the six-month mark, and what they're saying now. Year-over-year cohort analysis is a query, not a project.

Walk through your own cycle in 60 minutes
Stakeholder · STK-09134 · Maya Hernandez
5 years on record
Application submitted · 1,847-word essay
2024-04-12
Onboarding survey · pre-program baseline
2024-09-23
Mid-program check-in · confidence 3.4
2025-02-14
Completion outcomes · confidence 4.6
2025-06-08
Six-month follow-up · employment status
2025-12-15
Alumni follow-up · year 5
2028-08-15
Persistent ID rail 100% · Year 1 to Year 5
Cross-cycle cohort analysis is a single query against the rail.
Slide 1 of 7

Three of the twelve engines in motion. The full taxonomy below.

Engine 01

Stakeholder Intelligence

Programs that work with the same people across cycles
  • Application Intelligenceapply → admit
  • Scholarship Intelligenceaward → alumni
  • Award & Competitionsubmit → judge
  • Training Intelligencepre → mid → post
  • Survey Intelligencecollect → analyze
  • Longitudinal Intelligenceyear 1 → year 5
Engine 02

Partner Intelligence

Organizations that work with other organizations
  • Impact Intelligenceonboard → year 5
  • Portfolio IntelligenceDD → exit
  • Grant Intelligenceapply → report
  • ESG Intelligencescreen → monitor
  • Supplier Intelligenceonboard → audit
  • Cohort Intelligencecohort 1 → N

How does the data think for itself?

03 · The full feature surface

Four scopes of analysis. Eight sections of capability.

The Intelligent Suite — Cell, Row, Column, Grid — is the proprietary core, the four ways data is read inside Sopact Sense. Around it sit seven sections of platform capability: collection, logic, analysis, reporting, trust controls, AI integration, and a vibe-coded personalization layer built on Claude. All of it on one record.

The Intelligent Suite — proprietary core
Cell
Intelligent Cell
One field, read closely. Score and citations attached at collection.
Row
Intelligent Row
One record, seen whole. Multi-criteria rubric, defensible reasoning.
Column
Intelligent Column
One question, all respondents. Themes named, counted, with quotes.
Grid
Intelligent Grid
Dataset end to end. Patterns no single column reveals.
And around it · seven sections of capability
02CollectionPersistent ID, multilingual, offline
03LogicStructural · identity · analytical
04AnalysisRubrics · themes · citations
05ReportingFunder-ready exports · dashboards
06Trust & adminSSO (Coming Soon) · MFA · GDPR · audit log
07AccessibilityADA, EAA & WCAG (Coming Soon)
08AI & IntegrationMCP · REST · Webhooks · BI tools
09Buiild multi-source vibe coded dashboard (Claude & other) Built on Claude · branded yours
Slide 1 of 8 · The Suite, composed

The data thinks for itself.

Cell reads the field. Row reads the record. Column reads the question across the population. Grid reads the entire dataset across years. All four operate on the same persistent record format, so analysis at any scope feeds analysis at any other. Same evidence, different lens. The Suite is what makes Sopact a substrate, not a survey tool.

Scopes composed4
Record formatOne, persistent
Cross-scope analysisSame record, any lens
Stakeholder · STK-04287
4 scopes, one record
Application essay · 1,847 wordsCell · 4.2
Resume · 2 pagesfield
Recommendation 1 · Prof. Adlerfield
Recommendation 2 · Dr. Okaforfield
Interview transcript · 38 minfield
Cell scored this essay 4.2 / 5
Row weighted five fields into one fit assessment
Column named eight themes across 500 responses
Grid surfaced three patterns the columns missed
Slide 2 of 8 · One record, every cycle

Persistent ID is the cornerstone.

Sopact issues a unique stakeholder ID at first contact. That ID never resets. It runs through onboarding, mid-program check-ins, completion data, six-month follow-ups, and alumni surveys two years later. Every piece of evidence joins the same record under the same ID. Year-over-year cohort analysis becomes a query, not a three-week reconciliation project. Pre/post linking is automatic. Cross-cycle benchmarking is mechanical.

Years on one record5+
Cohort analysis timeSingle query
Pre/post matchingAutomatic
Stakeholder · STK-04287 · 5 years on record
Year 1 to Year 5
Application submitted · essay + resume + 2 letters
2024-04-12
Onboarding intake · pre-program baseline
2024-09-23
Mid-program check-in · confidence trajectory
2025-02-14
Completion outcomes · employment status
2025-06-08
Six-month follow-up · post-program metrics
2025-12-15
Alumni follow-up · year 5
2028-08-15
Persistent ID rail100% · One ID across 5 years
Slide 3 of 8 · Collection, enterprise-ready

Forms, files, interviews, all under one ID.

Forms and surveys ship in 40+ languages with native-quality translation. Offline collection works in the field, with answers syncing when connectivity returns. Document ingestion handles PDFs, Word files, spreadsheets, video transcripts, interview recordings. Longitudinal study design (pre/post, cohort, panel) is built in, not bolted on. Multi-channel: web, email, SMS, kiosk, in-app embeds. Branded for your organization: your logo, your colors, your domain.

Languages supported40+
ChannelsWeb, mobile, SMS, kiosk, embed
Offline collectionNative
Six channels, one record
WWeb form
MMobile
OOffline kiosk
PPDF upload
AAudio + transcript
{ }API
One record
STK-04287
All sources joined under one persistent ID
40+ languages, native-quality translation
ENESFRDEPTARHIZHJASW+30
Slide 4 of 8 · Logic the AI decides

The route is set by what the model extracted.

Three logic types. Structural logic routes pages and questions on respondent answers (table stakes; competitors have this). Identity logic skips questions when the answer is already on the persistent record (no re-asking name, demographics, or prior responses). Analytical logic, the unique one, routes based on what the AI extracted from open text, attached files, or voice. If a scholar's essay surfaces "first-generation college student," the next page asks about family support. Competitors cannot do this. Their forms do not read.

Structural logicTable stakes
Identity logicReads the record
Analytical logicReads the answer
Q5Tell us about a moment that changed your trajectory.
Three routes
Structural
If q4 = "yes" → show page 6. Routes on the dropdown.
Identity
Demographics already on STK-04287 → skip pages 2-3. No re-asking.
Analytical
Essay surfaces first-generation → next page asks about family support. The form reads what the model extracted.
Analytical is the differentiator. Competitor forms route on dropdowns. Sopact routes on what the AI read.
Slide 5 of 8 · Reporting funders read

Records that compound, not reset.

Funder-ready exports in the formats they actually want: structured PDF, branded slide deck, raw CSV, Excel with linked cells. Live dashboards update as data lands. No more snapshot-from-three-weeks-ago. Multi-cycle comparison is a toggle, not a project. Branded exports carry your logo, your colors, your domain. Citation traceability on every metric. Clicking the number takes the funder back to the source quote in the source record. Report library: starting templates for foundation, accelerator, workforce, ESG, scholarship.

Export formatsPDF, slides, CSV, Excel
Citation traceabilityEvery metric
Multi-cycle compareToggle
PSM Foundation
2024 Cohort Outcomes · Q4 report
Completion rate87%n=124
Confidence Δ pre to post+2.53 pts
First-generation students68%demo
Every number traceable to a source record. Click to verify.
Compare cycle
20242023
Export · branded yours
PStructured PDF
SBranded slides
CRaw CSV
XExcel · linked cells
Slide 6 of 8 · Enterprise security

Auth, access, audit, attestation.

Single sign-on via SAML 2.0: Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, OneLogin, Auth0. Multi-factor authentication required by default; TOTP apps, hardware keys, push notifications. Role-based access control with workgroup permissions. Analyst sees their cohort, director sees the program, funder sees the dashboard. Per-field permissions for sensitive demographics. AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit. Full audit log, immutable, exportable, with retention configurable to your policy. Reasoning trace on every AI score: what the model read, which rubric criteria fired, why the score was what it was. GDPR-aligned. CCPA-aligned. Regional data residency: EU, US, others on request. SOC 2 Type II in progress. Data processing agreements available.

SSO · SAML 2.0
Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, OneLogin, Auth0
MFA required by default
TOTP apps, hardware keys, push notifications
RBAC + per-field permissions
Workgroups, sensitive demographics scoped
AES-256 + TLS 1.3
At rest and in transit, all environments
Reasoning trace + audit log
Why every AI score fired. Immutable, exportable.
GDPR + CCPA + SOC 2 Type II
SOC 2 II in progress. Data residency: EU, US, others on request.
Audit trail · live
14:02:47score.run · STK-04287 · usr_a3c
14:02:51field.read · demographics · usr_dir
14:03:18export.pdf · cohort-2024 · usr_funder
14:05:09record.create · STK-04288 · system
Slide 7 of 8 · AI-native integration

MCP first. REST always. Your stack, connected.

Model Context Protocol native. Sopact is consumable as an MCP server, so Claude, ChatGPT, and other agentic clients can read and write directly into your records. Full REST API for the rest. Webhook support for event-driven flows (record created, score completed, cycle closed). Zapier connector for the long tail. BI tools out of the box: Power BI, Tableau, Looker Studio, Mode. Data warehouse mirroring: Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, with schema preserved, lineage maintained, dbt-friendly. CRM integration through webhooks or Zapier: Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics. Slack and Teams notifications for human-in-the-loop alerts.

AI agents
MCPClaudeOpenAIGemini
BI tools
Power BITableauLookerMode
Substrate
Sopact Sense
Bidirectional · MCP first · REST always
Warehouse
SnowflakeBigQueryRedshiftdbt
Operations
SalesforceHubSpotSlackTeams
REST API · webhooks · Zapier · schema preserved · lineage maintained
Slide 8 of 8 · Vibe-coded for your tenant

Built with AI. Branded yours. Live in minutes.

Tell Claude what dashboard you need, in plain English, in the chat. Claude builds it on your live data, deploys it inside your tenant, branded for your organization. Custom workflows the same way. Custom report formats the same way. Per-tenant deployment with white-label domain support. Tenant isolation at the data and compute layer. Onboarding measured in days, not quarters. The dashboard a foundation needs in May is built in May, not next year's roadmap.

See it built on your data in 60 minutes
Claude · Tenant: psm-foundation
You
Build a dashboard showing PSM cohort completion outcomes, branded for the foundation.
Read schema · 6,400 records
Composed three live metrics
Applied PSM Foundation theme
Deployed to tenant · live
PSM cohort outcomes
Live · 2024 cohort
Completion rate87%
Confidence Δ+2.5
First-gen students68%
Live in 4 minutes · Tenant: psm-foundation · Branded yours
Slide 1 of 8

Bring a real cycle. Sixty minutes is enough.

One application round. One cohort. One portfolio quarter. We walk through how it would live as one record per stakeholder, what the Intelligent Suite would extract, and what your team would do differently in the next cycle.

Book a discovery call →
FormatDiscovery call · 60 min
WithFounder & CEO, Unmesh Sheth
OutcomeA clear next step, or none